Dear Philosopher or Philosophically-Minded Person,
Launched in May 2017, PHILOSOPHY WITHOUT BORDERS is an online
mega-project for creating and sharing seven different kinds of
original philosophy, all of them freely available to anyone, anywhere,
world-wide.
We’re reaching out to academic philosophers and independent
philosophers, and to other critically thoughtful, insightful,
reflective people, everywhere.
Here are our latest posts—
Mudlark, Captain, and Chalmers.
https://againstprofphil.org/2018/10/01/mudlark-captain-and-chalmers/
A Plague On Both Your Houses: A Social Anarchist Lament in Shakespearian Mode.
https://medium.com/@bobhannahbob1/a-plague-on-both-their-houses-a-social-anarchist-lament-in-shakespearian-mode-c3b3a9953612
Borderless Philosophy 2 (2019): Third Call for Submissions.
https://againstprofphil.org/2018/09/28/borderless-philosophy-2-2019-third-call-for-submissions/
On The Deeper Source of The Fragility of Human Dignity.
https://againstprofphil.org/2018/09/26/on-the-deeper-source-of-the-fragility-of-human-dignity/
Borderless Philosophy 1 (2018).
https://www.cckp.space/publications-cskp
Contemporary Studies in Kantian Philosophy 3 (2018).
https://www.cckp.space/publications-cskp/page/1
***
PHILOSOPHY WITHOUT BORDERS is home-based on Patreon, here—
https://www.patreon.com/philosophywithoutborders
Please consider becoming a patron!
WEBSITE ADDRESS: searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com A SITE DEDICATED TO USING THE DISCIPLINES OF CRITICAL THINKING AND LOGIC.
Friday, October 5, 2018
Thursday, October 4, 2018
Voice your opinion: Trump's Supreme Court nominee. Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring.
David,
The Senate could vote in the next few days on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court. In the last week, we've seen some of the worst of American politics on display, both during his confirmation hearing and even from President Trump – heartless rhetoric, elitism, sexism and blind partisanship. But we've also been inspired by the brave people standing up, even when so many stood against them. With critical issues potentially coming before the Supreme Court – from a women's right to choose and protections for those with pre-existing conditions, to voting rights and Citizens United – this could be the most consequential confirmation of our lifetime. So as we approach this critical vote, Mark and our team want to hear from you: | ||
| ||
Thank you,
Team Herring |
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
JUDGE KAVANAUGH- LISTEN TO THE RESPONSE. UPDATE: A TRUMP MINION DEFENDS..
U.S. Sen. Susan Collins said the following, to explain her "REASONING" IN SUPPORTING JUDGE KAVANAUGH FOR THE SUPREME COURT:
"In evaluating any given claim of misconduct, we will be ill served in the long run if we abandon the presumption of innocence and fairness, tempting though it may be," she said. "We must always remember that it is when passions are most inflamed that fairness is most in jeopardy."
HOWEVER, JUDGE KAVANAUGH GETS A FREE PASS FROM THIS:
" Revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups. This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination. The consequences will be with us for decades."
I GUESS HIS ACCUSERS ARE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD THAN HE IS.
THAT IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF REPUBLICAN HATE SPEECH BEING PROTECTED BY ONE OF DONALD TRUMPS MINIONS.
*********************************************************************************
THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM JUDGE KAVANAUGHS TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, REGARDING ACCUSATIONS MADE AGAINST HIM.
"This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about president trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups. This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination. The consequences will be with us for decades."
WHAT CAN WE TAKE FROM THIS?
#1. Anger- Does this reference the Unconstitutional denial of President Barack Obamas choice for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, a chance to testify before the Senate, to be followed by a public vote?
BUT YOU'RE BEING TREATED UNFAIRLY. REALLY?
#2. President Trump and the 2016 Election- You mean an election with Bogus Returns in at least 6 States that handed Donald Trump the White House, paving the way for him placing 2 Judges on the Supreme Court.
Do you mean "FEAR" of having the future course of Judicial Precedents decided by DONALD TRUMP, whose behavior while in the WHITE HOUSE is often considered to be IRRATIONAL AND VINDICTIVE?
#3. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons- I assume you have the facts to back this up, since this is a direct accusation. Also, Do you mean that the Clintons planned and executed these plans directly, or are unwitting pawns that had no knowledge about the attempt to create this "Circus"?
IS THIS HOW A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SHOULD CONDUCT HIMSELF IN THE FACE OF ADVERSITY?
TO BE CONTINUED...?
Monday, October 1, 2018
Tomorrow in Boston: Tell Senator Flake to reject Kavanaugh. Jennifer Childs-Roshak, MD, MBA President Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts @DrJenCR
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)