Paid for by Patrick Ryan for Congress. |
WEBSITE ADDRESS: searchingforreasondotnet.blogspot.com A SITE DEDICATED TO USING THE DISCIPLINES OF CRITICAL THINKING AND LOGIC.
Tuesday, June 12, 2018
Monday, June 11, 2018
Dereliction of duty. CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE STEVE SEVIGNY, MD.
Dear David,
We learned yesterday that the office of Florida’s Commissioner of Agriculture didn't bother to do background checks on concealed carry permit requests for a year. A staffer couldn't log in to the system, so they just didn't bother.
This failure has endangered the lives of residents and visitors of Florida. We also know that Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam failed to ensure the duties and responsibilities of his office were properly executed.
Commissioner Putnam has bragged about being, “A proud NRA sellout.” During his tenure Florida has experienced two of the most terrible mass killings in recent memory at Pulse and Parkland. He remains proud of his commitment to the NRA, and he has honored that commitment to make it easier for the gun manufacturers to drive profits up while our loved ones are terrorized and killed in our communities.
We must also have a thorough investigation of this situation, auditing the permits that were issued and also who knew what, when they knew it, and what did they do about it. At what point did Governor Rick Scott become aware? Attorney General Pam Bondi? Did either of them take serious action to rectify the situation or did they assist Commissioner Putnam in his efforts to obfuscate and protect his electoral viability for his campaign for Governor?
Whether we are speaking of US Congress, state Constitutional offices, or municipal elected officials, we should be holding people in these positions and seeking them to a higher standard. We should demand accountability and transparency, and we certainly shouldn't offer promotions to those that have demonstrably failed to perform the duties of their office.
Sincerely,
Steve
Learning from history. CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE KEN HARBAUGH.
David,
This morning the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ohio’s practice of purging registered voters from our voter rolls.
We should be learning from history, not repeating it.
As a nation, we are stronger when MORE of us participate in our democracy. That starts at the ballot box. We should be making it easier -- not harder -- for folks to vote.
Instead, Ohio is silencing the voices our government should want to hear. In her dissent, Justice Sotomayor wrote that these voter purges “disproportionately affected minority, low-income, disabled, and veteran voters."
Under our current law, veterans can be eliminated from the voting rolls after as few as two missed elections. Our military men and women put their lives on the line to defend our freedom. They deploy to the four corners of the earth. They miss birthdays and holidays and, yes, even Election Days. And this is how we repay them?
Now, more than ever, 2018 is a year to fight back. No matter how the other side might try to silence us, we have to show up. We have to vote. We have to bring our friends and neighbors to vote.
We have to make our voices heard.
In service,
Ken
I AGREE. WE SHOULD ALSO MAKE SURE THAT OUR ELECTION OFFICIALS SHOW UP AND DO THEIR JOBS. OUR CURRENT PRESIDENT IS THE RESULT OF A BOGUS AND FRAUDULENT 2016 ELECTION. VOTES DON'T MEAN MUCH IF SOMEONE IS RIGGING THE RESULT. - DAVID.
LOGIC. WHAT ARE DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS? PART 1.
You Have Probably Heard These Terms Used Many Times.
Perhaps it was the Classroom, Job Site, or even Television/Movies.
However, were they used Correctly?
To Introduce this Section, Let's Start with a Couple of Examples.
In a Valid Deductive Argument, if the Premises are True,
THE CONCLUSION MUST BE TRUE.
Here is an Example of a Valid Deductive Argument;
All Politicians are Deceitful People.
All Deceitful People can't be Trusted.
Therefore, All Politicians can't Be Trusted.
Now a Valid Inductive Argument;
Most Politicians Never Tell the Truth.
Our Congressman Promises to Not Raise Taxes.
Therefore, Our Congressman will Probably Raise Taxes.
An Inductive Argument Points to the Probability of the
Conclusion Being True, but it is not a Certainty.
IN THE NEXT POST ON THIS TOPIC, WE'LL EXAMINE SUCH
TERMS AS VALID/INVALID, WHICH INDICATE IF THE ARGUMENT
IS LAID OUT, OR CONSTRUCTED CORRECTLY. THAT, AND WHY
EXAMINING THE TRUTH OF THE PREMISES IS THE KEY TO
EVALUATING THE STRENGTH OR WEAKNESS OF EACH ARGUMENT.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)