About Me

My photo
SEEKONK, MASSACHUSETTS, United States

Sunday, April 30, 2023

HOW A HERO TALKS ABOUT A TRAITOR AND A COWARD.

 


A SHORT TWITTER EXCHANGE ABOUT THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN BUSINESS MATTERS.

 

MUSK UNIVERSITIES QUOTES

“Socialism vs capitalism is not even the right question. What really matters is avoiding monopolies that restrict people’s freedom.”

MY RESPONSE:

No, it's the realization that the State has a responsibility to all citizens, not just the needs and desires of the businessman, who don't always care what happens beyond their own profit margin.

PRESIDENT BIDEN HITS THE NAIL ON THE HEAD.

 


BREAKING: President Biden ROASTS Elon Musk and his failing MAGA Twitter with a blistering joke at tonight’s State of the Union address, declaring that if Republicans REALLY want to “make NPR go away,” they should have “Elon Musk buy it.” Clearly, Biden knows that Elon Musk is running Twitter into the ground by turning it into a far right cesspool full where neo-nazis and Russian propaganda flourish — all under the guise of “free speech.”

Saturday, April 29, 2023

THE REAL REASON TUCKER CARLSON IS NO LONGER WITH FOX. ANOTHER LESSON IN LOGIC. THE FOX NEWS MYTHOS. PART 2.

 

I waited patiently the last week or so, to see if anyone would pick up the real significance

of Tucker Carlsons abrupt departure from FOX, and what it really means. 

Well, that didn't happen, from either side of the Political Spectrum, so let's get into

it now.


Just before Tucker Carlsons release from FOX, his final real assignment

had nothing to do with the settled Dominion Lawsuit, or the 2020 Election Conspiracy that

he pushed, knowing full there was no evidence to support it.


None of that...it was an extensive interview with ELON MUSK, which was nothing

more than an obvious COMMERCIAL TO TRY AND CONVINCE EVERYONE WHAT

A "GREAT" and "NOBLE" Human Being this TRUMP ALLY REALLY IS.


Unfortunately for Carlson and Musk, this Puff Piece fooled no one who was not already

a Self-Deluded Musk Groupie, who will not accept any factual data that does not "DEIFY"

their hero. ( Hello Trumpians, does that Mindset sound familiar?)


This Interview failed to give the FAR-RIGHT what they wanted: A Fascist Symbol to stand

beside Trump, but one who had none of  TRUMPS EXTENSIVE NEGATIVE POLITICAL 

BAGGAGE.


So Tucker Carlsons biggest "Coups"...

- VIDEOS SENT TO CARLSON BY THE FASCIST LEADERSHIP... FAILED TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE 2020 ELECTION WAS FRAUDULENT. (TRUMP DENIED.)

- THE MUSK INTERVIEW... DID NOT RESULT IN HIM BECOMING THIS FAR-RIGHT CHAMPION THAT AMERICANS TRUSTED. HE IS AS DISTRUSTED AS TRUMP IS, SOMEONE WHO LIES EASILY AND OFTEN.

...FAILED THE FAR-RIGHT AGENDA.

TUCKER CARLSON FAILED TO ACHIEVE THE GOALS THAT HE WAS BEING PAID FOR.

NOT AS A REPORTER.

NOT AS A PROGRAM HOST.

BUT A PAID PROPAGANDIST.

POINT #2- FOX IS NOT CONCERNED WITH EMPLOYING NEWS PROFESSIONALS WHO REPORT ACCURATE, IMPARTIAL, AND PRACTICAL INFORMATION THAT BENEFITS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. IN GENERAL, THEY WANT EMPLOYEES THAT WILL PUSH A POLITICAL AGENDA THAT PLEASES A CORE SET OF VIEWERS AND ATTRACTS NEW "DISCIPLES" WHO WILL BUY INTO THEIR WORLDVIEW THAT REQUIRES NO INTELLECTUAL EXAMINATION TO BLINDLY ACCEPT. IN FACT, QUESTIONING ANYTHING IS ACTIVELY DISCOURAGED. 

TUCKER CARLSON PROPAGANDIST HAD TO GO.


Friday, April 28, 2023

Can you legally be kicked out of a restaurant for praying before a meal?...I answered this question on QUORA.

 

Can you legally be kicked out of a restaurant for praying before a meal if the people in the table next to you are bothered by your praying and complain to the manager and the manager asks you to leave?



Profile photo for David Mcdonald
Yes, but it is not the subject matter itself that would be judged by the Legal System, but how the behavior itself was manifested. You have the RIGHT TO PRAY ANYWHERE YOU WANT.
However, you do not have the Right to create a disturbance that a reasonable person would object to, given the TIME, PLACE, and CIRCUMSTANCES.
It may be alright to scream out your devotions in Church, but not in a public area where all Americans expect freedom from the Ill-Mannered and Rude individuals who are disrupting the experience.
Praying at normal conversation tones would and should be tolerated until the words turn into a form of intimidation that crosses the line, either by Volume and/or Content, or disrupts the proceedings that prevent others from receiving the benefits that brought them to such a Meeting, Event, or Learning Experience.
If the manager kicked you out for simply engaging in a Religious Conversation he would be opening himself up for Legal Actions that he would find hard to defend in Court.
AGAIN: TIME, PLACE, CIRCUMSTANCES.


CONGRATULATIONS FROM TUMBLR.

 500 posts!


Wednesday, April 26, 2023

THE GUN CONTROL DEBATE: TIME TO SETTLE THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL. PART 1.


FIRST WE ARE GOING TO REPRINT THE ONLY TWO PARTS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION THAT ARE RELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION:

FROM ARTICLE 1, SECTION. 8 The Congress shall have Power...

...To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress...

THE 2ND AMENDMENT

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Important terms:

MILITIA- IS NOW CALLED THE NATIONAL GUARD.

REGULATION- A RULE OR LAW THAT IS ADMINISTERED BY A RECOGNIZED LEGAL AUTHORITY.

DISCIPLINE- TRAINING AND SUPERVISING INDIVIDUALS TO FOLLOW SPECIFIC RULES, AND OBEDIENCE TO A DEFINITIVE CODE OF CONDUCT. 

SEE PART 2.

Tuesday, April 25, 2023

ONCE AGAIN: GREAT ATHLETE OR ENTERTAINER DOES NOT EQUAL...



A QUOTE FROM BRETT FAVRE, MY GUESS IN RESPONSE TO THIS NEWS STORY:

Mississippi Welfare Scandal Update: Judge rules former NFL QB Brett Favre will remain as a defendant in a civil lawsuit that seeks to recover millions of dollars of misspent welfare money.

"Circuit Judge Faye Peterson wrote that Favre's attorneys made 'unpersuasive and inapplicable' arguments in seeking to have him removed as one of more than three dozen people or businesses being sued by the Mississippi Department of Human Services.



MY TWITTER RESPONSE:

Wow, really helps your case, endorsing the most Destructive Traitor and Fraud the U.S. has ever produced. Apparently, you and Der Fuehrer Trump have the same Fascist Principles. THE NFL HALL OF SHAME. "hard working tax paying citizens"- You mean the people you are accused of...

AND

..." Freedom of speech...Religion...2nd Amend...freedom of choice...," Since Trump does not believe in those ideals, and you endorse him, we can evaluate you as the same type of GOP NAZI. GREAT ATHLETE DOES NOT EQUAL DECENT HUMAN BEING, YOU PROVE THE POINT.




A BRIEF NOTE.

Once again Medical Necessity caused a brief pause in activity on the Website over the weekend, Thanks for your patience, David.


...and a continuing Thumbs Up for the excellent care I am receiving through SOUTH COAST HEALTH, CHARLTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND THEIR ASSOCIATED MEDICAL PRACTICES. 

Monday, April 24, 2023

Tucker Carlson out at Fox News, network confirms. ASSOCIATED PRESS.

 

FILE - Tucker Carlson, host of "Tucker Carlson Tonight," poses for photos in a Fox News Channel studio on March 2, 2017, in New York. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)(AP)


NEW YORK (AP) — Fox News said Monday it has “agreed to part ways” with Tucker Carlson, its popular and controversial host, less than a week after settling a lawsuit over the network’s 2020 election reporting.

The network said in a press release that the last program of “Tucker Carlson Tonight” aired Friday.

“We thank him for his service to the network as a host and prior to that as a contributor,” the press release from the network said.

Carlson became Fox’s most popular personality after replacing Bill O’Reilly in Fox’s prime-time lineup in 2016. He’s also consistently drawn headlines for controversial coverage, including most recently airing tapes from the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection to minimize the impact of the deadly attack.

There was no immediate explanation from Fox about why Carlson was leaving.

His name came up during the recently settled case with Dominion Voting Systems, primarily because of email and text messages that were revealed as part of the lawsuit. In some of them, Carlson privately criticized former President Donald Trump, saying he hated him passionately.

A few weeks ago, Carlson devoted his entire show to an interview with Trump.

“Fox News Tonight” will air in Carlson’s 8 p.m. ET prime-time slot, hosted by a rotating array of network personalities, for the time being.

Sunday, April 23, 2023

MY SHORT TWITTER TRANSLATION OF MUSKS "STARSHIPS" PERFORMANCE. (FROM 4/20/2023.)


WHAT MUSKS SPOKESMAN SAID: “Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,” Insprucker said.

MY TRANSLATION: "It quickly broke apart in mid-air as it was climbing, an event that caught us by surprise."

Thursday, April 20, 2023

OUR CORRUPT/INCOMPETENT SUPREME COURT MAJORITY: SELECTED POSTS #1.

 

THE MUELLER REPORT AND TESTIMONY, ARTICLES AND POSTS, START TO FINISH: BREAKING DOWN THE MUELLER REPORT: A BRIEF TIMEOUT. PART 3. IMPORTANT UPDATE.


FROM NPR NEWS- 6/27/2019.
In a 5-4 decision along traditional conservative-liberal ideological lines, the Supreme Court ruled that partisan redistricting is a political question — not reviewable by federal courts — and that those courts can't judge if extreme gerrymandering violates the Constitution.

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU IGNORE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, AND ALLOW THE OPPOSITION TO CONTROL THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR A NEW SUPREME COURT JUSTICE?

Image result for mitch mcconnell images- public domain photos

OR

WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU DO NOT CHALLENGE BOGUS RETURNS IN A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, HANDING THE WHITE HOUSE TO A SELF - CENTERED DEMAGOGUE?

Image result for donald trump images- public domain photos



ANSWER TO BOTH.

YOU GET DONALD TRUMPS CHOICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT.


Image result for judge kavanaugh images- public domain photos



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM JUDGE BRETT KAVANAUGHS TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, REGARDING ACCUSATIONS MADE AGAINST HIM.

"This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about president trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups. This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination. The consequences will be with us for decades."

WHAT AN INTELLECT!! FITS IN WITH TRUMP AND MCCONNELL PERFECTLY.
WHAT ELSE CAN WE TAKE FROM THIS?

#1. Anger-  Does this reference the Unconstitutional denial of President Barack Obamas choice for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, a chance to testify before the Senate, to be followed by a public vote? 

BUT YOU'RE BEING TREATED UNFAIRLY. REALLY?

#2. President Trump and the 2016 Election- You mean an election with Bogus Returns in at least 6 States that handed Donald Trump the White House, paving the way for him placing 2 Judges on the Supreme Court.

Do you mean "FEAR" of having the future course of Judicial Precedents decided by DONALD TRUMP, whose behavior while in the WHITE HOUSE is often considered to be IRRATIONAL AND VINDICTIVE? 

#3. Revenge on behalf of the Clintons- I assume you have the facts to back this up, since this is a direct accusation. Also, Do you mean that the Clintons planned and executed these plans directly, or are unwitting pawns that had no knowledge about the attempt to create this "Circus"?

IS THIS HOW A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SHOULD CONDUCT HIMSELF IN THE FACE OF ADVERSITY?




Washington Dc, Boulevard, Avenue, Street

So, What do I mean when I say: TODAYS DONALD TRUMP IS WHAT 
HE WAS ALLOWED TO BECOME....

Ask yourself the following question: OF THE THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT;  EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE, AND JUDICIAL, WHAT IS THE HIGHEST OFFICE/MOST POWERFUL POSITION THAT CAN BE OCCUPIED IN EACH BRANCH?

ANSWER.

EXECUTIVE-    PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.

LEGISLATIVE-  U.S. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER.
                     SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REP.

JUDICIAL-        ONE OF THE NINE MEMBERS OF THE
                       U.S. SUPREME COURT.

Now, in most recent history, what events have most influenced the
current state of each office. 

For that, let's go back a few years.

THE SUPREME COURT.

On FEB,13, 2016 SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA passed away.
THEN PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, following procdedures Set forth in the U.S.
CONSTITUTION, nominated JUDGE MERRICK GARLAND TO FILL THE VACANCY.       

The following passage is taken from the U.S. CONSTITUTION.


"...and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for..."

However, for the first time in U.S. HISTORY, THE U.S. SENATE DID NOT MEET TO QUESTION THE NOMINEE, SO THAT THEY COULD "ADVISE" THE PRESIDENT, AND VOTE TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE OF THE JUDGE GARLAND NOMINATION. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL DECIDED THAT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS NOT A DUTY OR OBLIGATION THAT THE U.S. SENATE HAS, BUT CAN BE FOLLOWED WHENEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IT. SO, HE REFUSED TO SEAT THE SENATE TO ACT ON THE NOMINATION.

GIVEN SENATOR MCCONNELLS LEGISLATIVE HISTORY, I DON'T EXPECT MUCH IN THE WAY OF FAIR AND INTELLECTUALLY JUSTIFIABLE REASONS FOR THE POLITICAL AGENDA HE PUSHES. HOWEVER, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTIES REFUSAL TO FILE SUIT, AND BRING THIS MATTER INTO COURT TO FORCE MCCONNELL AND OTHER REPUBLICANS TO OBEY THE OATH THEY TOOK TO "SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION," SHOWED AN INEXPLICABLE LACK OF MORAL AND INTELLECTUAL COURAGE. WHAT MESSAGE DO YOU THINK THIS SENT TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? TO BAD, IT WAS ONLY THE BEGINNING.

IS IT THE END? MUSK ANSWERS, I RESPOND ON TWITTER.

The following was a question asked by Tucker Carlson to Elon Musk in a recent interview on FOX.

.: "Will civilization end with a bang or a whimper? Well, it's currently trending to end with a whimper in adult diapers, which is depressing as hell."

My Response:
Will, if it does, it will be led by people like TRUMP, MUSK, AND CARLSON who put themselves, and their personal desires, ahead of the Good for all Mankind. Tell us again about the 2020 Election, and how Donald was cheated? Nice to see two Hypocrites...

In addition..."whose attitudes and behavior have done their best to push a Trumpian/Fascist Ideology in the U.S. (Spare me the Trump is mad at Musk diatribe, that Love/Hate relationship is getting old fast.)