Mitch McConnell says calls for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from January 6-related cases are an 'inappropriate pressure campaign'
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on October 21. Drew Angerer/Getty Images
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Wednesday decried criticism of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, dismissing Democratic-led calls for the jurist to resign or recuse himself from January 6, 2021-related cases as an "inappropriate pressure campaign."
The Kentucky Republican — who voted to confirm Thomas to Supreme Court in 1991 and played a leading role in installing three conservative jurists to the court during President Donald Trump's tenure — rejected the concerns as a "coordinated effort to nullify" the justice's presence on the court.
"The left's quest to delegitimize the Supreme Court found its latest outlet," McConnell said on the Senate floor. "Washington Democrats are now trying to bully this exemplary judge of 30-plus years out of entire legal subjects, or off the court entirely."
On Thursday, The Washington Post and CBS News reported on 29 text messages exchanged between the former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and Ginni Thomas, Clarence Thomas' wife and a longtime conservative activist, in which Ginni Thomas urged Meadows to pursue efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential-election results.
The texts are in the possession of the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, and the panel is expected to request an interview with Ginni Thomas, CNN reported Monday.
Since the news broke, more than two dozen Democratic lawmakers have demanded that Clarence Thomas recuse himself from cases concerning the insurrection, raising concerns about a conflict of interest. Prominent legal-ethics experts have also expressed concerns that Ginni Thomas' political activities present a conflict of interest for her husband.
Democrats have scrutinized Clarence Thomas' decision not to recuse himself from a Supreme Court order handed down two months ago in which the court rejected Trump's bid to withhold White House records from the Capitol-riot committee as part of its investigation.
Thomas was the sole dissenter. He did not provide any reasoning for his decision, which is standard for such emergency motions that reach the high court. In addition to pushing for his recusal from insurrection-related cases, Democrats have urged Thomas to provide a written explanation for his dissent.
Democrats have also renewed calls for legislation that would establish an ethics code for Supreme Court justices. Under current law, justices decide when to recuse themselves from cases.
Some progressive lawmakers — including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York — have called for Thomas to resign or face impeachment, which McConnell broadly dismissed on Wednesday.
"Far-left House members are talking about dusting off their party's impeachment addiction for a third consecutive year," he said. "Make no mistake: This performative outrage is not in earnest. This is a political hit, part of liberals' years-long quest to delegitimize the court."
Ocasio-Cortez on Tuesday tweeted that Thomas' refusal to "recuse himself from matters involving his wife" required an investigation.
McConnell said Democrats had for years sought to "bully" conservative justices "based on spurious accusations about fake ethical problems or partiality." He called on Thomas to "ignore" the most recent criticism.
"This new inappropriate pressure campaign is just a continuation of this well-worn pattern," he said. "It has no basis in Justice Thomas' decades of impeccable service on the bench. The justice and the entire court should feel free to ignore it."
McConnell also criticized Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer for his 2020 comments in which the Democratic lawmaker said Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh would "pay the price" if they tried to curtail abortion rights.
"In 2020, the Democratic leader himself stood on the steps of the Supreme Court and threatened multiple sitting justices by name if they didn't reach the policy outcome that liberals wanted," he said.
(CNN)Florida Gov.Ron DeSantis on Tuesday received and quickly vetoed new congressional boundaries approved by the Republican-controlled legislature, setting upa showdownwith his own party over how to proceed with a new map for the state.
DeSantis said he will call lawmakers back to Tallahassee next month for a special session to take another stab at redrawing district lines in a way that satisfies his demands.
The two sides have been at odds for months as DeSantis has pressed his party's legislative leaders to pass an aggressive reapportionment of the state's 28 congressional districts that would eliminate two districts where Black residents are a plurality. Republicans earlier this month defied DeSantis — who is used to getting his way — and passed its own map that maintains the same number of Black districts.
Lawmakers could override the governor's veto or punt to the courts and hope their map prevails. But a key Republican state senator previously told CNN that neither of those outcomes are likely, and he now expects the legislature to draw a map that can win the governor's signature.
"We would have to try again to pass a map that the governor would be interested in signing," Sen. Ray Rodrigues, the Republican point person on redistricting in the Senate, told CNN last week. "The maps that would have the best chance of standing up to legal challenge are maps that are passed by both houses of the legislature and signed by the governor."
Florida is one of just five states without a final map, creating widespread uncertainty for midterm candidates who don't yet know the boundaries of the districts they may be running in. Lawmakers must also account for a new congressional seat after the most recent decennial census. The filing deadline for candidates in Florida is June 17 and the primary election is in August.
Enter your email to sign up for CNN's The Point with Chris Cillizza.
Siding with the governor is a path that may lead lawmakers to a courtroom -- a scenario Republican lawmakers were trying to avoid when they started the once-a-decade redistricting process. The state House and Senate initially considered maps that adhered more closely to the existing district lines in hopes of fending off a legal challenge.
DeSantis has recently acknowledged that he wouldn't mind if the redistricting fight leads to a legal battle. His own map proposal eliminated two House districts -- the 5th and the 10th -- represented by Black Democrats. It was critiqued by opponents as a clear violation of a state constitutional amendment known as Fair Districts, which requires lawmakers to give minority communities an opportunity to "elect representatives of their choice."
DeSantis' endgame is for a court to deal a blow to the Fair Districts amendment, approved by voters in a ballot referendum last decade to reduce political influence in the map-drawing process. On Tuesday, DeSantis said he believes the way Florida courts interpreted the Fair District amendment last decade could be a violation of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
"Our goal in all of this is to have a constitutional map," DeSantis said Tuesday.
The battle has also earned DeSantis, a potential contender for the White House in 2024, considerable praise from Republicans who want to see the state GOP use their power to push a more partisan map.
Prior to the veto on Tuesday, two lawsuits had already been filed asking courts in Florida to set new US House districts, citing DeSantis' veto threat as evidence of an impasse.
Still, lawmakers have an incentive to quickly reach a conclusion to the redistricting fight: State law prohibits lawmakers from fundraising for their campaigns while in Tallahassee for a legislative session, a nuisance that would be especially felt during an election year.
If Republicans move toward DeSantis' demands, Democrats will surely frame it as lawmakers caving to DeSantis.
"At that point, I don't understand why anyone in the majority conference would want to be a legislator. You're just a cog in the wheel labeled 'Governor DeSantis,'" said House Minority Leader Evan Jenne. "If you're just going to abdicate all your responsibilities to someone who is not your constituent, why are you here?"
Eyes on Florida
With the US House closely divided, both parties are closely watching the developments in Florida. Despite early predictions that Republican-controlled state houses across the country could draw their party into the House majority, national Democrats have been largely pleased with how they have fared in redistricting.
Republicans in many states had already pressed their redistricting advantage last decade when a tea party wave installed GOP leaders in states where governments were previously divided or run by Democrats. There weren't many opportunities to gain more seats without making incumbents more vulnerable, said Michael McDonald, a political science professor and redistricting researcher at the University of Florida.
That wasn't the case in Florida, where a court installed a map drawn by grassroots reformers in 2015 after years of legal challenges and failures by the GOP legislature to pass a map.
"It's one of the few places in the country where Republicans can gain seats with even a modest gerrymander," McDonald said. "Suddenly Florida has become really important in this chess board."
The buildup
This year, Florida's redistricting process was chugging along without drama when DeSantis unexpectedly unveiled his own map in January, an unprecedented step for a Florida executive. That proposal from DeSantis -- who is up for reelection this fall -- is a much more partisan map, one that could give Republicans the advantage in at least 18 of the 28 districts in the state, and as many as 20. Florida Republicans currently hold 16 seats in the US House to 11 for the Democrats.
The DeSantis map would break up the 5th Congressional District, one of four districts in the state where Black voters are a plurality. It is currently represented by Lawson, who is Black.
Critics say this tactic could weaken your vote in 202202:16
DeSantis has said he believes the district, which spans the state's northern border with Georgia to connect Black communities in Tallahassee and Jacksonville, is unconstitutional. His office has pointed to a 2017 US Supreme Court ruling of a North Carolina congressional seat in which the court said it was unconstitutional in most instances to racially gerrymander a district. DeSantis on Tuesday said the district is an example of a "pure racial gerrymander" intended to get a Democrat elected.
Lawson in a statement on Tuesday said DeSantis has "made it clear that his ultimate objective was to cut the number of African Americans and Hispanic Americans serving in Congress" and he took issue with the governor's interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
"The fact that DeSantis justifies his goal to create racial disparities in congressional representation by citing the constitutional amendment created following the Civil War for the very purpose of remedying those same disparities is absurd and will be soundly rejected by any credible judge," Lawson said.
National Republicans have eyed Lawson's seat as a vehicle for future challenges ever since it was implemented by the court.
"A lot of people on my side of the aisle believe the Florida Supreme Court imposed a racial gerrymander on the state of Florida and it just hasn't been challenged," said Adam Kincaid, president and executive director for the National Republican Redistricting PAC.
The organization, created to coordinate and influence GOP redistricting efforts across the country, has not been involved in Florida's redistricting debate.
"What you have with the existing Florida 5 is in our view improperly imposed and it was drawn to create a Democratic seat in north Florida," Kincaid said.
For months, state Republican lawmakers rejected similar arguments from DeSantis. They operated under the assumption that a district created by the court would pass constitutional muster and that the state's Fair District amendment prohibits lawmakers from eliminating a seat that gives Black voters a voice in Congress. In addition to representing Tallahassee and Jacksonville, Lawson's district also includes Gadsden County, the only Black-majority county in the state, as well as large African American populations in other counties along the Georgia border that once made up the Southern plantation Black Belt.
DeSantis' map would also break up the 10th Congressional District, currently represented by US Rep. Val Demings, a Black Democrat from Orlando now running for US Senate.
Rodrigues, who was previously dismissive of DeSantis' position, now says it warrants consideration. He also said recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding redistricting plans passed in other states may also play a factor. Still, he didn't know how the state House and Senate would bridge the gap between their approved map and the one DeSantis wants. Already, they had made significant concessions to DeSantis, passing a map that shifts District 5 east to create a new Black access district around Jacksonville.
"The governor has a legitimate point," Rodrigues said. "Let's see if there's a way the map can be drawn to address it."
8-hour gap in Trump’s Jan. 6 White House phone records
By MARY CLARE JALONICK, COLLEEN LONG and JILL COLVIN WASHINGTON (AP) — The House panel investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol has identified an almost 8-hour gap in official White House records of then-President Donald Trump’s phone callsas the violence unfolded andhis supporters stormed the building, according to two people familiar with the probe.
The gap extends from a little after 11 a.m. to about 7 p.m. on Jan. 6, 2021, and involves White House phone calls, according to one of the people. Both spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the ongoing investigation.
The committee is investigating the gap in the official White House log, which includes the switchboard and a daily record of the president’s activities. But it does not mean the panel is in the dark about what Trump was doing during that time.
The committee’s effort to piece together Trump’s day as his supporters broke into the Capitol underscores the challenge that his habitual avoidance of records laws poses — not only to historians of his tumultuous four years but to the House panel, which intends to capture the full story of the former president’s attempt to overturn the election results in hearings and reports later this year.
The committee has trained a particular focus on what the president was doing in the White House as hundreds of his supporters beat police, broke into the Capitol and interrupted the certification of Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory. The missing records raise questions of whether Trump purposefully circumvented official channels to avoid records.
Trump was known to use other people’s cell phones to make calls, as well as his own. He often bypassed the White House switchboard, placing calls directly, according to a former aide who requested anonymity to discuss the private calls. It is not unusual for presidential calls to be channeled through other people.
It is unclear whether the committee has obtained records of cell phone calls made that day. The panel issued a broad records preservation order in August to almost three dozen telecommunications and social media companies, demanding that the companies save communications for several hundred people in case Congress decided to issue subpoenas for them. Individuals included in that request included Trump, members of his family and several of his Republican allies in Congress.
The committee also is continuing to receive records from the National Archives and other sources, which could produce additional information and help produce a full picture of the president’s communications.
While hundreds of people have cooperated with the probe, in some cases the panel has been hampered by Trump’s assertions of executive privilege over material and interviews. Courts have overruled his efforts to block some documents, but many witnesses who are still close to the former president — and several who were in the White House that day — have declined to answer the committee’s questions.
Biden, who has authority as the sitting president over his predecessor’s White House privilege claims, said Tuesday he would reject Trump’s claims concerning the testimony of his daughter, Ivanka Trump, and her husband, Jared Kushner.
Kushner, who was one of Trump’s top White House aides, is scheduled for an interview with the panel on Thursday. The committee has requested an interview with Ivanka Trump as well, but has not said whether she will comply.
During the roughly eight hours on Jan. 6, Trump addressed a huge crowd of supporters at the nearby Ellipse, repeated falsehoods about his election defeat and told them to walk to the Capitol, make their voices heard and “fight like hell.” He then returned to the White House and watched as the mob broke into the Capitol. More than 700 people have been arrested in the violence.
Several of Trump’s calls that day are already publicly known. He spoke to Vice President Mike Pence between 11 a.m. and 11:30, according to a person familiar with that conversation, as he had been lobbying Pence publicly and privately to object while presiding over the certification. He also spoke with several GOP members of the House and Senate as his allies in Congress were preparing to challenge the official vote count.
He had a tense conversation with House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy, who asked him to call off the mob, according to Republican Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington state, who shared McCarthy’s account shortly after the insurrection. Trump responded that the rioters must be “more upset about the election than you are,” according to Herrera Beutler.
Trump also talked to Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan and Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, among other lawmakers. Tuberville has said he spoke to the president while the Senate was being evacuated. Utah Sen. Mike Lee has said that Trump accidentally called him when he was trying to reach Tuberville.
The White House log does show calls Trump made before that time period, as he was preparing to speak at the rally. That log shows calls with his former aide Steve Bannon, conservative commentator William Bennett and Sean Hannity of Fox News, according to one of the people familiar with the records.
The gap in the phone records was previously reported by the AP. The exact length of time of the gap was first reported jointly by The Washington Post and CBS News.
Trump had no immediate comment Tuesday, but he has previously disparaged the investigation and sued to stop records production.
___
Associated Press writer Zeke Miller contributed to this report.
President Joe Biden delivers a speech about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, at the Royal Castle, Saturday, March 26, 2022, in Warsaw. Evan Vucci/AP
FROM BUSINESS INSIDER.
Lets get this straight; THE POTUS is being criticized for the following:
This is a QUOTE from President Bidens speech given in Warsaw, Poland.
Biden on Putin: “For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power.”
A QUOTE REFERRING TO VLADIMIR PUTIN, WHOSE REGIME:
- Helps to Rig the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election,
placing a Puppet President in the White House. (TRUMP)
Evidence also indicates interference in U.S. Senate and State level Elections,
ensuring Victories for specific GOP Candidates. (Latest Virginia)
SO A FOREIGN POWER HELPS THE GOP COMMIT ELECTION FRAUD...BUT HONEST AMERICANS SHOULD APOLOGIZE FOR WANTING THE RESPONSIBLE LEADER OF THAT NATION OUT OF OFFICE?
REALLY?...HILARIOUS...
- Invades a SOVEREIGN NATION, (UKRAINE),with no justification except a desire
to
seize control of a DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED GOVERNMENT, and use its
resources to increase his FASCIST INFLUENCE IN EUROPE AND ASIA.
-
Cracks down on any Dissension in his own country, with LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
THE COURT SYSTEM RE-INTRODUCING STALINISM.
- Threatens Dire consequences to any country who aids UKRAINE with Military Assistance.
- Has his Military target Civilian, Medical, and Humanitarian Locations to increase Non-Combatant Casualties.
...AND BIDEN IS BEING CRITICIZED FOR SAYING THIS "HEAD OF STATE" SHOULD NOT BE IN POWER? HOW MANY ACTS OF WAR/WAR CRIMES DOES HE HAVE TO COMMIT BEFORE WE DECIDE HE IS A DANGER TO THE PEACE AND PROSPERITY OF THE ENTIRE WORLD?
